Ethereum Devs Delay Difficulty Bomb — ETH 2.0 Contract Surpasses 13 Million Ether Deposits – Technology Bitcoin News

On June 30, Ethereum developers delayed the network’s difficulty bomb via the Gray Glacier update, which means The Merge won’t happen at least until September 2022. Meanwhile, there’s now more than 13 million ethereum locked into the Beacon Chain worth $15.8 billion using today’s prices.

More Than 13 Million Ether Worth $15.8 Billion Deposited Into the Ethereum 2.0 Contract

This week the ETH 2.0 contract has seen a total of more than 13 million ETH deposited and there are now 406,640 validators. In time, the Ethereum (ETH) blockchain is expected to transition to a proof-of-stake (PoS) chain. Currently, the network has a hybrid system of both proof-of-work (PoW) for the main chain, and PoS for the Beacon chain. At the time of writing, the 13,012,469 ether locked into the ETH 2.0 contract is worth more than $15.8 billion using current ETH exchange rates.

The 13 million in ETH stems from 76,506 depositor addresses and the aggregate represents 10.88% of the entire ETH supply today, according to Dune Analytics statistics. 31.73% of the share is staked via the liquid staking application Lido. Besides Lido, other large staking services include companies like Kraken,, Stakefish, Bitcoin Suisse, and Figment. While many thought the PoS transition, otherwise known as The Merge, would possibly happen in August, the difficulty bomb update has pushed The Merge further away.

Ethereum Devs Aim to Avoid Network Degradation Due to a Premature Activation of the Difficulty Bomb

On June 30, the Ethereum network updated to Gray Glacier at block height 15,050,000 which pushes the difficulty bomb back by 100 days. “The Gray Glacier network upgrade changes the parameters of the Ice Age/Difficulty Bomb, pushing it back by 700,000 blocks, or roughly 100 days,” Ethereum developer Tim Beiko disclosed on June 16, 2022. “With Ropsten now transitioned to proof-of-stake, the difficulty bomb only affects the Ethereum mainnet. This means Gray Glacier will not be deployed on any testnet,” he added.

In addition to the delay, Ethereum network fees have remained low and at the time of writing, the average network fee is 0.0018 ETH or $2.16 per transaction. Today, a median-sized Ethereum network fee is 0.00078 ETH or $0.955 per data transfer. Furthermore, since August 5, 2021, or since the implementation of EIP 1559, approximately 2,523,831 ETH worth $8.4 billion has been destroyed.

Essentially, the difficulty bomb is a “Planned exponential increase in proof-of-work difficulty setting designed to motivate the transition to proof-of-stake, reducing the chances of a fork.” EIP 5133’s notes explain the motivation behind the delay is to “avoid network degradation due to a premature activation of the difficulty bomb.”

Tags in this story
Beacon Chain, bitcoin suisse, difficulty bomb, EIP 5133, EIP-1559, ETH mining, ether, Ether Mining, Ethereum, Ethereum (ETH), Figment, Gray Glacier, Hashrate, Ice Age, Kraken, Lido, Liquid Staking, mining, Mining Eth, network upgrade, PoS, PoS transition, PoW, Proof of Work, Proof-of-Stake,, Stakefish, technology, Tim Beiko, transition, Upgrade, Vitalik Buterin

What do you think about Ethereum developers delaying the difficulty bomb? When do you expect Ethereum to transition to a full PoS chain? Let us know your thoughts about this subject in the comments section below.

Jamie Redman

Jamie Redman is the News Lead at News and a financial tech journalist living in Florida. Redman has been an active member of the cryptocurrency community since 2011. He has a passion for Bitcoin, open-source code, and decentralized applications. Since September 2015, Redman has written more than 5,700 articles for News about the disruptive protocols emerging today.

Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

Source link

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top